6..3.2 Understand and use rotations (3)
6..3.3 Understand and use reflections (3)
This
week's tasks involve reflection and rotation, but not of everyday objects; rather, the tasks are based on items from the CSMS Reflection and Rotation test that I developed.
Monday: This task looks rather unprepossessing, but it has proved to be quite challenging for some students. In part, this might be because students are rarely confronted with slanting mirror lines, other than the occasional line at 45˚ to the horizontal and vertical.
Wednesday: This is another item from the CSMS Reflection and Rotation test. We found that 20% of the Year 9 sample answered this correctly, with roughly another 40% drawing the image with the correct slope but in the wrong position. It was rare for students to draw the image with one or other end-point in the correct position but with a wrong slope.
Thursday: This shows some responses to Wednesday's task. We found that it was quite common for students to place the image such that the base-points of the object and image were symmetrical about the centre of rotation, as in these three examples. Students who did this, usually drew an image with the correct slope (22% of the total sample), as in the case of Cleo and Dev, with a few (3% of the total sample) getting the slope wrong too, as with Eze.
Friday: This task is based on another item from the CSMS test. The original item was answered correctly by 14% of the Year 9 sample (using the criterion for 'correct' that we had devised), with another 25% giving a point roughly equidistant from the flags (like Hui, below) but not one that would give a 90˚ rotation. The point drawn by Gina, below, was particularly popular (21% of the sample) as was the 'symmetrical' point drawn by Flo (10%).
Note: It is interesting to consider the role that tracing paper can play in rotation tasks. Tracing paper could be useful in Task 17C for giving a sense of how the flag moves, although students would still need to determine where the movement stops. Its usefulness in 17E, say, to help locate a centre, is far less clear cut. It would provide an effective way of testing whether a chosen point is correct; however, it won't necessarily give useful feedback beyond that: if a chosen point turns out to be wrong, it can be difficult to see where an improved choice might be - so more a case of trial and error upon error than trial and improvement.